David Irving - Hitler----s War-la Guerra De Hitler | -castellano-.pdf //top\\

La Guerra de Hitler (Hitler's War) de David Irving es una obra de 1977 que intenta argumentar que Adolf Hitler no ordenó el Holocausto y era un líder menos involucrado en las atrocidades de lo que sostiene el consenso académico. A pesar del uso de fuentes primarias por parte de Irving, la obra ha sido desacreditada por la manipulación de pruebas y se considera un pilar del negacionismo del Holocausto. Para obtener detalles técnicos sobre la controversia, visite Wikipedia .

When Irving sued American historian Deborah Lipstadt for calling him a "Holocaust denier" in her book, the trial became a public dissection of Hitler's War .

Publisher | Location | Year | Pages | Format | ISBN ---|---|---|---|---|--- GeoPlaneta | España | 1977 | -- | -- | -- Planeta | España | 1980 | -- | -- | 9788486041755 Planeta | Mexico | 1989 | 665 | Paperback | 9789684062788 Solar | Colombia | 2018 | 666 | Paperback | 9789588786728

The story of this book culminated in a massive legal battle in 2000 that destroyed Irving's reputation. La Guerra de Hitler (Hitler's War) de David

Irving utilized thousands of pages of primary documents, including unpublished diaries and private correspondence of high-ranking Nazi officials (such as Goebbels and Himmler), to reconstruct a day-by-day account of Hitler's decision-making.

Irving’s primary objective in writing Hitler’s War was to strip away the post-war biases of Nuremberg trial testimonies and reconstruct the conflict exactly as Hitler experienced it. To achieve this, Irving spent years tracking down the private diaries, letters, and stenographic records of Hitler’s closest aides, generals, and secretaries.

Critics noted that Irving accepted Hitler’s self-serving statements at face value while dismissing overwhelming circumstantial evidence connecting him to the final solution. When Irving sued American historian Deborah Lipstadt for

In the Spanish edition, La guerra de Hitler , Irving’s preface often includes disclaimers that he is not a Nazi sympathizer—claims that the London court later deemed deceptive. The book covers major military campaigns (Poland, France, Stalingrad, D-Day, the Battle of the Bulge) while systematically omitting or reinterpreting evidence of the Holocaust, Einsatzgruppen massacres, and Hitler’s direct orders for genocide.

"La Guerra de Hitler" es uno de los trabajos más influyentes y polémicos de Irving. En él, presenta una visión detallada de la guerra desde la perspectiva de Hitler, basándose en fuentes primarias, incluyendo diarios y documentos del Führer. Irving argumenta que Hitler, pese a su reputación como un líder brutal y despiadado, fue un patriota alemán que actuó motivado por el deseo de corregir los agravios percibidos hacia Alemania después de la Primera Guerra Mundial y el Tratado de Versalles.

The story of Hitler's War is the story of a historian who tried to exonerate a dictator. It is a cautionary tale about how history is written, the danger of bias, and the line between historical revision and the distortion of truth. Irving’s primary objective in writing Hitler’s War was

Irving’s stated goal in writing “Hitler's War” was a bold one: to clean away what he saw as the "years of grime and discoloration from the facade of a silent and forbidding monument" in order to reveal the “real Hitler,” whose reputation Irving claimed had been unfairly slandered by historians. To achieve this, he sought to .

From the moment of its publication, Hitler's War was met with a firestorm of negative criticism from the academic historical community. Reviewing the book in The Sunday Times , historian Gitta Sereny famously described it as "closer to theology or mythology" than to history. German historian Martin Broszat labeled Irving a "Hitler partisan wearing blinkers," suggesting a willful ignorance of the facts. Time magazine's Lance Morrow wrote that Irving's depiction of the Führer as "a somewhat harried business executive too preoccupied to know exactly what was happening... at Auschwitz" was "hard to accept".

"Hitler's War" by David Irving is a controversial, discredited revisionist text that claims to present WWII from Hitler’s perspective, arguing he was unaware of the Holocaust and misled by subordinates. The work is widely rejected by mainstream historians due to documented manipulations of evidence and a 2000 libel trial that exposed deliberate misrepresentation of historical facts. For a neutral overview of the work's critical reception, read Critical responses to David Irving Wikipedia

is a biographical account of World War II written from the specific perspective of Adolf Hitler